Over the past several years I have written often on how much funding I believe the aged care sector has been short-changed by a range of political and bureaucratic decisions over. Aged care funding is not adequate to meet the health care needs of Australia’s frail elderly, vulnerable, care recipients. My comments apply across residential aged care funding and home/community care package funding alike. You can review some of my previous articles in the footnotes below.  
Patricia Sparrow, Chief Executive of the not-profit aged care peak body Aged and Community Services Australia (ACSA), commentating recently on home care packages, lamented the lack of preparedness and capability of our aged care system, saying “Until we see adequate long-term planning for the structural and funding issues, Australia won’t be able to fully address the needs of older Australians”. Sean Rooney, Chief Executive of Leading Aged Services Australia, similarly recently commented that the “aged care system needs adequate funding to be sustainable and meet the needs of seniors” and called for an additional $3 billion to “improve the viability of the sector”.
Just this week I was briefed about the outcomes of a very recent Faster Horses Inside Aged Care Report (2019) of perceptions around aged care in Australia. I recommend this review to all readers of this blog. Reviewing response from over 1,500 people from a cross section of metropolitan centres, the response to two specific questions piqued my interest.
Only 17% of all respondents felt that the pricing model used by aged care providers is straightforward, and a high 63% of respondents agreed with the statement “There is not enough funding given to the aged care industry”. For respondents who currently have a family member receiving aged care services, the response rate for each question increases to 31% and 71% respectively. It is clear that even among those active in the industry, there is a poor understanding of pricing models, and there is a heightened need for additional funding in the industry.
The truth is out there, speaking loudly! More funding is required – urgently and significantly – for viability, and to begin to fund an appropriate level and mix of well-trained staff.
Our elected Members and Senators, and career bureaucrats should listen closely. Australia gets it that the burgeoning wave of frail elderly is going to hungrily devour scarce national fiscal resources. But having an ineffective aged care system is injurious to these same people. Let’s actively change the funding system that better reflects our overall capacity to pay from our own resources where we can, to care services that add value and quality to our lives, rather than a system that is building distrust, poor quality, decreased value of older persons’ lives, and, in some cases, harm and injury.
Wayne L Belcher
 ACSA, Home Care Funds welcome but won’t dent waiting lists for home care. Aged & Community Services Australia <https://www.acsa.asn.au/Media/2019/Home-Care-Funds-welcome-but-won-t-dent-waiting-lis>. Accessed 12 September 2019.
 Natasha Egan, Provider CEO survey highlights impact of financial pressures. Australian Ageing Agenda <https://www.australianageingagenda.com.au/2019/09/06/provider-ceo-survey-highlights-impact-of-financial-pressures/>. Accessed 9 September 2019.